Re: [PATCH] Prefix each line of multiline printk(KERN_<level> "foo\nbar") with KERN_<level>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Joe Perches wrote:
> Corrected printk calls with multiple output lines which
> did not correctly preface each line with KERN_<level>
> 
> Fixed uses of some single lines with too many KERN_<level>

> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/ecard.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/ecard.c
> @@ -547,7 +547,8 @@ static void ecard_check_lockup(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  	if (last == jiffies) {
>  		lockup += 1;
>  		if (lockup > 1000000) {
> -			printk(KERN_ERR "\nInterrupt lockup detected - "
> +			printk(KERN_ERR "\n"
> +			       KERN_ERR "Interrupt lockup detected - "
>  			       "disabling all expansion card interrupts\n");
>  
>  			desc->chip->mask(IRQ_EXPANSIONCARD);

What's the purpose of having lines printed with e.g. `KERN_ERR "\n"' only?
Shouldn't these just be removed?

Usually lines starting with `\n' are continuations, but given some other
module may call printk() in between, there's no guarantee continuations
appear on the same line.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux