Re: (STA.functional && !STA.present)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 09 March 2007 00:49, Len Brown wrote:
> Matthieu,
> what good things happen if instead of using bjorn's current
> tweak to simply set STA.present we use your patch here
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3358
> which doesn't re-write the bits?
> 
> Bjorn, will the case that provoked your change still work?
> 
> it is interesting now to google for:
> "functional but not present; setting present"
> it comes up on more than Tiger systems...

Shall we discard the patch in this bug report?
Shall we keep the current code and discard the warning?

-Len
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux