Re: ACPI on Averatec 2370

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> > MSR_K8_ENABLE_C1E lo == 0x04c14015
> > MSR_K8_ENABLE_C1E hi == 0x00000000
> > lo & ENABLE_C1E_MASK == 0
> 
> And yeah, that claims that C1E is not on, but:
> 
> > amd_apic_timer_broken: forcing return value of 1

So it seems my initial debugging report was, err, incomplete. I failed to 
notice that the amd_apic_timer_broken function was getting called twice, 
once for each core.

The second call shows this:

  MSR_K8_ENABLE_C1E == 0x14c14015

which causes our ENABLE_C1E_MASK check to be true and thus properly 
return 1 from the function. So when we call the above function from 
init_amd we prolly need to do a

  set_bit(X86_FEATURE_LAPIC_TIMER_BROKEN, c->x86_capability);

for each core if any of them happen to return true upon checking for a 
broken timer.

Andi, does that seem right?

-- 
Cal Peake

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux