Re: [PATCH 06/12] ACPI: button: re-scan lid state on resume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Len,

Could have another look at linux-acpi thread:
[patch] Refresh lid state on resume
http://marc.info/?t=118467309200008&r=1&w=2

It came out that moving GPE activation before _WAK is called, fixes the
problem. Not sure whether this one should still be added. IMO we should
try with the real fix (moving GPEs before _WAK) first. If there are
still machines having the problem, adding this one can still be added at
later time, it's harmless.
The patch to activate GPEs before _WAK is this one, can you take it pls:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=118587857102639&w=2
or do you think it's too risky?

Thanks,

     Thomas

On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 18:33 -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> From: Richard Hughes <richard@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> On resume we need to refresh the lid status as we will not get an event if
> the lid opening was what triggered the suspend.
> This manifests itself in users never getting a "lid open" event when a
> suspend happens because of lid close on hardware that supports wake on
> lid open. This makes userspace gets very confused indeed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Hughes <richard@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/button.c |   25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/button.c b/drivers/acpi/button.c
> index 5405813..b3c88aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/button.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/button.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, button_device_ids);
>  
>  static int acpi_button_add(struct acpi_device *device);
>  static int acpi_button_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type);
> +static int acpi_button_resume(struct acpi_device *device);
>  static int acpi_button_info_open_fs(struct inode *inode, struct file *file);
>  static int acpi_button_state_open_fs(struct inode *inode, struct file *file);
>  
> @@ -87,6 +88,7 @@ static struct acpi_driver acpi_button_driver = {
>  	.ids = button_device_ids,
>  	.ops = {
>  		.add = acpi_button_add,
> +		.resume = acpi_button_resume,
>  		.remove = acpi_button_remove,
>  	},
>  };
> @@ -497,6 +499,29 @@ static int acpi_button_remove(struct acpi_device *device, int type)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +/* this is needed to learn about changes made in suspended state */
> +static int acpi_button_resume(struct acpi_device *device)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_button *button;
> +	struct acpi_handle *handle;
> +	struct input_dev *input;
> +	unsigned long state;
> +
> +	button = device->driver_data;
> +	handle = button->device->handle;
> +	input = button->input;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * On resume we send the state; if it matches to what input layer
> +	 * thinks then the event will not even reach userspace.
> +	 */
> +	if (!ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_LID",
> +						NULL, &state)))
> +		input_report_switch(input, SW_LID, !state);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int __init acpi_button_init(void)
>  {
>  	int result;

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux