Re: [patch 00/17] PNP Lindent

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 25 July 2007 10:24:44 am Len Brown wrote:
> > We could do it now if it's more convenient for you - there's not usually
> > much happening in that area.
> 
> I agree it would be make-work to carry Lindent patches in -mm.
> 
> I think it is also a PITA to push them to Linus before RC1
> because that is when a huge torrent of functional patches go in.
> 
> I think that between RC1 and RC2 (now) is as good a time as any
> to push a Lindent cleanup to Linus.  If you guys agree, I'll
> be happy to Lindent pnp and push it right now.  Heck, I try
> to keep acpi Lindent-clean, so I could do that at the same time.
> 
> Bjorn, did you have to do any manual fix-ups to Lindent, or
> did it actually get it right automatically?
> Over time, I've actually changed some of the syntax of the ACPI code
> so that it wouldn't confuse subsequent Lindent passes:-)
> In particular, it didn't like macros that included their own ';'s.

I did do some manual fixups afterward.  I can collect those into a
separate patch if you want.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux