On 7/18/07, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 08:45:19PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:37:33AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 19:09 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > > > > That's fine, we have information that lets us distinguish between > > > models. > > Well, I don't think we have all, at least I don't and anyway it's nice > to have some way to add new models that doesn't require waiting for a new > kernel to be available. They can still be overridden in exactly the same way - it's just a question of sending useful defaults on most machines. If a user finds that the defaults don't work they can still be remapped via hal, but the aim should be for that to be unnecessary where possible.
I guess it all depends on how well HAL updates will be integrated with distributions and whether users update kernels more often than the rest of the system. For example I am still using FC 3 (I was going to upgrade to 7 but I guess it won't happen until 8 is released ;) ) so for me kernel is better ;) I think we should continue adding keymaps to kernel until everyone is using HAL's facilities to load keymaps and then stop. Does this make sense? -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html