Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Is there some reason why you should get rid of it? Is it causing a lot work to maintain?On Jul 9 2007 17:45, Alan Cox wrote:This patch contains the scheduled removal of the ACPI procfs interface.What part of "we do not gratuitously break user space interfaces" is so hard for people to understand.Generally I am with you on that, but if everyone keeps on using /proc -- and I do[*] -- we will never get rid of it.
[*] Does someone have an alternative for /proc/acpi/battery/BAT1/{state,info}?
-- Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx> "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
