On 5/31/07, Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx> wrote:
(This should efficiently be the same as the proposed big patch a year ago from Pekka Enberg, just a bit smaller and should make ACPICA and kernel/linux people happy: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=113699535303722&w=2)
No, you're keeping these obfuscating macros around: +#define return_VOID return +#define return_ACPI_STATUS(s) return(s) +#define return_VALUE(s) return(s) +#define return_UINT8(s) return(s) Making the ACPI code look like regular Linux kernel code (or even regular C for that matter) was the whole point of my patch. Your patch doesn't change that. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
