On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 10:18:17AM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Matthew, > >We've already got KEY_PROG* - is this not the sort of situation they're > >for? (ie, keys that aren't mapped to a specific purpose but would be > >potentially useful to userspace at the per-user level) > > > > Right. These are they keys "we have no idea how to use these, leave it > to the user". Do we really need more of these? We have quite a few > codes that might be useful. I just don't want to keep adding a new > input keycode every time we encounter an unmarked key somewhere. Sorry, I wasn't clear - I was thinking that they should just be used for this case, rather than that more of them be added. > >Changing the keymap is a privileged operation, so sending /some/ sort of > >keycode by default would probably be good. > > > > It's up to the security policy on a particular box. One could change > /dev/input/evdev ownership to the user currently logged on physical > console. Most users will be logged into X, so it's the X keymap that's the most interesting one. X tools know how to remap the X keymap without requiring any sort of special privileges, so all we need is for the keycode to generate /something/. I think KEY_PROG* would make the most sense, and that's what we've adopted in Ubuntu. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
