f5f72b46c349fefcfd4421b2213c6ffb324c5e56 appears to break the userspace interface to the CMOS alarm. This could previously be accessed via /proc/acpi/alarm, but if RTC_DRV_CMOS is enabled that vanishes. The help text for the module doesn't mention this, which makes tracking it down a touch irritating. I'm not actually sure why this is the case. It doesn't look like the two interfaces are fundamentally incompatible. I agree that removing the proc code is a good long-term aim, but it'd be nice to be able to test the new RTC code without removing existing functionality. (It doesn't really help that rtc-cmos doesn't load on this machine, but I'll try to track that down later - right now I suspect some sort of PNP issue) -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html