On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 10:46:21AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2007 00:42:08 +0900 Mattia Dongili wrote: ... > > Given the drivers/acpi/Kconfig portion > > > > if ACPI > > ... > > config ACPI_EC > > bool > > default y > > help > > ... > > > > config ACPI_POWER > > bool > > default y > > > > config ACPI_SYSTEM > > bool > > default y > > help > > ... > > ... > > endif > > > > I'd expect the 3 symbols to be all set when CONFIG_ACPI=y. > > What am I overseeing? > > I think that this is just 'make randconfig' throwing a curve ball. > ACPI depends on PM, but PM=n. In my experience, randconfig is a > good tool for testing oddball configs, but the results are not > always something that is fixable or needs to be fixed. It looks like Kconfig does the right thing on i386 though. Not the same on x84_64. -- mattia :wq! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
