On Sun, 13 May 2007 22:07:39 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Yeah, I expect quite a few people will start seeing that. iirc it was > > triggered by a couple of changes: a local_irq_save/local_irq_restore > > in sched_clock() and a change Jeremy made to the softlockup detector. > > hm, i specifically asked to not do local_irq_save/restore in > sched_clock(). It's the _scheduler_ clock and it very absolutely > positively needs no flags save/restore. > It got taken out again. It doesn't matter though: a local_irq_save/restore in some callee shouldn't cause the locking API tests to break. And they're apparently now breaking without that local_irq_save/restore in there anyway. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
