On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 22:45, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 20:36 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Well, apparently, not in -mm2: > > > > rafael@albercik:~/src/mm/linux-2.6.21-mm2> grep -r -I -l 'timekeeping_resume' * > > kernel/time/timekeeping.c > > rafael@albercik:~/src/mm/linux-2.6.21-mm2> grep clocksource_resume kernel/time/timekeeping.c > > rafael@albercik:~/src/mm/linux-2.6.21-mm2> > > Andrew dropped the patch because it did not work on his jinxed VAIO, but > he debugged with the patch applied. I see. In that case, since timekeeping_resume() is called via sysdev_resume, then it's executed before acpi_leave_sleep_state() and may very well interfere with the ACPI methods executed from there, depending on what's happening in the cs->resume() callbacks in clocksource_resume(). Greetings, Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
