On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 15:19, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 15:12 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 14:24, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 13:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 10:59, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 01:31 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > > I suspect I just tested the wrong thing yesterday. Let me recheck just > > > > > > > these patches against 2.6.21. > > > > > > > > > > > > yup, same hang with just these three: > > > > > > > > > > > > origin > > > > > > clocksource-fix-resume-logic > > > > > > clockevents-fix-resume-logic-updated-version > > > > > > > > > > I have no idea, how this affects acpi_evaluate_object() > > > > > > > > I think the problem is that the ACPI code ordering here is broken in a > > > > difficult to fix way. > > > > > > Any explanation aside of witchcraft why this is affected by the clock > > > event resume changes ? > > > > Well, where is unregister_time_interpolator() called from? > > # grep -rn unregister_time_interpolator . > ./kernel/timer.c:1893:unregister_time_interpolator(struct time_interpolator *ti) > ./include/linux/timex.h:270:extern void unregister_time_interpolator(struct time_interpolator *); > > I don't see a caller. i386 does not use time interpolator anyway. > > # find -iname Kconfig | xargs grep TIME_INTERPOLATION > ./arch/sparc64/Kconfig:37:config TIME_INTERPOLATION > ./arch/ia64/Kconfig:60:config TIME_INTERPOLATION But clocksource_resume() has no other caller, AFAICS ... Well, I don't see any explanation that wouldn't involve witchcraft. Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
