On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 13:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 10:59, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 01:31 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > I suspect I just tested the wrong thing yesterday. Let me recheck just
> > > > these patches against 2.6.21.
> > >
> > > yup, same hang with just these three:
> > >
> > > origin
> > > clocksource-fix-resume-logic
> > > clockevents-fix-resume-logic-updated-version
> >
> > I have no idea, how this affects acpi_evaluate_object()
>
> I think the problem is that the ACPI code ordering here is broken in a
> difficult to fix way.
>
> Definitely, we shouldn't execute the _BFS method after creating the image
> and most probably _WAK shouldn't be executed here either. Moreover,
> acpi_leave_sleep_state() enables the runtime GPEs, which AFAICS
> is equivalent to allowing ACPI to generate SCIs. I'm not sure if this is a
> good idea to do such a thing in this particular place.
>
> Andrew, could you please apply the appended patch and see if that
> helps (should apply to -mm2)?
Argh, sorry. This needs yet another patch (sent for review to linux-pm) to
be applied. The following one is against -mm2:
---
NOTE: This is not a complete solution, because it removes the enabling of GPEs
from the resume-during-hibernation code path entirely, which probbably is not a
good idea in general.
---
kernel/power/disk.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6.21-mm2/kernel/power/disk.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.21-mm2.orig/kernel/power/disk.c
+++ linux-2.6.21-mm2/kernel/power/disk.c
@@ -205,7 +205,6 @@ int hibernate(void)
if (in_suspend) {
enable_nonboot_cpus();
- platform_finish();
device_resume();
resume_console();
pr_debug("PM: writing image.\n");
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
