On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 00:48 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Crazy idea... could we kill hibernate_ops-like struct, and just create > a device for ACPI, using its suspend()/resume()/whatever callbacks to > do the ACPI magic? Doesn't that have the ordering problem again? You must ensure that this sysdev is suspended as the last one, and that's currently impossible if ACPI is modular. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
