On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Shaohua Li wrote: > On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 02:58 +0800, Len Brown wrote: > > It is useful to see what Microsoft is doing with ACPI in Vista -- > > as that shapes many of the BIOS implementations that Linux will > > encounter: > > > > http://download.microsoft.com/download/5/b/9/5b97017b-e28a-4bae-ba48-174cf47d23cd/CPA002_WH06.ppt > vista disable MSI per fadt.iapc_boot_arch flags, looks we should do the > same. This means we don't need MSI quirk too. It actually means we need both. Not every manufacturer is Intel. > I'm curious why firmware shouldn't change low 1M memory between sleep, > considering some ranges are reserved. It is quite possible that they mean it as in "don't change the contents of non-reserved ranges, nor the ranges themselves". -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
