On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 11:24:21AM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > I don't follow this at all. Most of the relevant devices have a PCI > device driver, not an ACPI device driver. Surely you aren't proposing > that PCI drivers should incorporate lots of ACPI-specific code (which > won't be useful on non-ACPI platforms) before they start to work right? PCI devices have a handle to their ACPI object in platform_data, so it's easy enough to have generic code that interacts with both objects. > For a PCI device driver, pci_enable_wake() is all the hook that it should > ever need. If ACPI magic is needed, it should be called from inside that > routine. Yeah, I don't see that being a problem. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
