Re: WMI vs Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 03:44:41PM -0400, Len Brown wrote:

> I was wondering if you could tell me about it.
> I was just about to write a little driver that binds to PNP0C14 and tells the
> user that they should not buy machines with WMI extensions and run Linux on them --
> but maybe an exception to that rule already exists?

It would be helpful to export as much WMI information as possible - we 
can supply information to utilise it via HAL, which would at least 
provide support for doing things like poking the wireless and bluetooth 
hardware on the old HP tablets.

I agree that WMI functionality is generally a bad sign, but where we can 
drive it I think we probably should be.

> ps. while you're at it, what is the WACF005 Wacom Digitizer device also in the patch --
> I don't see that upstream either.

It's handled by 8250_pnp.c now.
-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux