Alexey Starikovskiy said on 12/03/2007 2:46 PM:
Nigel Nigel wrote:
----------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:16:51 +0300
From: alexey.y.starikovskiy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: nigels@xxxxxxxxxxx
CC: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [repost] acpi on gentoo
Nigel wrote:
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:57:58 +0300
From: alexey.y.starikovskiy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: nigels@xxxxxxxxxxx
CC: luming.yu@xxxxxxxxx; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [repost] acpi on gentoo
Nigel wrote:
response inline
[skipped]
I asked if copying of single file helps... I didn't ask you to copy
all acpi files two kernel releases back and make it work...
If there is a relatively simple way to get this to work. Let me know.
Copy one file: drivers/acpi/ec.c
Sorry, I should have explained in more detail. I did copy just the
one file to start with, and got this :
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/linux/compile.h
CC drivers/acpi/ec.o
drivers/acpi/ec.c: In function 'acpi_ec_gpe_handler':
drivers/acpi/ec.c:467: warning: implicit declaration of function
'acpi_os_execute'
drivers/acpi/ec.c:467: error: 'OSL_EC_BURST_HANDLER' undeclared (first
use in this function)
drivers/acpi/ec.c:467: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported
only once
drivers/acpi/ec.c:467: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[2]: *** [drivers/acpi/ec.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/acpi] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2
Is there something I can do to get this going ?
change call to acpi_os_execute to call to
acpi_os_queue_for_execution() as it was in 2.6.17.
It is just rename of the function in this case.
I changed this:
status = acpi_os_execute(OSL_EC_BURST_HANDLER,acpi_ec_gpe_query, ec);
To this:
status = acpi_os_queue_for_execution(OSD_PRIORITY_MED,acpi_ec_gpe_query,
ec);
Not sure if this is the right thing there: OSD_PRIORITY_MED
It compiles with a warning:
# make
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/linux/compile.h
LD [M] drivers/acpi/processor.o
Kernel: arch/i386/boot/bzImage is ready (#29)
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST
WARNING: drivers/acpi/processor.o - Section mismatch: reference to
.init.data: from .text between 'acpi_processor_power_init' (at
offset 0xe75) and 'acpi_safe_halt'
LD [M] drivers/acpi/processor.k
Is this warning a problem ?
Well, nothing seems to have changed it works as before. Still no events
received by acpid
Otherwise I'll just leave it, and hopefully in a year or so I'll be
able to upgrade.
Ok.
Thanks,
Nigel.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
_________________________________________________________________
Explore the seven wonders of the world
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=7+wonders+world&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
</pre
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
