Re: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> >>Can you take this as a wishlist item?
> >>
> >>It would be nice if next version of acpi specs supported table
> >>
> >>'AML / SMM BIOS will access these ports'
> >>
> >>...so we can get it correct with acpi4 or something..?
> >>    
> >
> >I can only second Pavel's wish here. This would be highly convenient
> >for OS developers to at least know which resources are accessed by AML
> >and SMM. Without this information, we can never be sure that OS-level
> >code won't conflict with ACPI or SMM.
> >
> >  
> BIOS vendors are not required to support latest and greatest ACPI spec. 
> So even if some future spec version
> will include this ports description, we will still have majority of 
> hardware not exporting it...

That's okay... vendors are not required to support _ACPI_, but they
mostly do. Can we get the "ports used by BIOS" table to the spec?
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux