Re: final set of EC init patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Len Brown wrote:
why is fake_ecdt no longer necessary -- because ec initializes first now?

right
while I'm glad to see the ec_burst_enable exported -- it is currently
not called and we continue to always operate in normal mode, yes?

yes
it seems that burst mode is intended for when we want to push
a series of commands to the ec, so we'd
1. enable burst mode
2. do a bunch of ec transactions
2. disable burst mode
right?

right
Anybody got any candidates for a series of transactions that would
benefit from this mode?  If yes, is it possible to detect an efficiency
benefit from enabling burst mode for that series?

the one obvious candidate is smart battery, it reads all of its data as separate read/writes through EC.
yes, i like "boot_ec" better than "ec_ecdt".

glad to hear that :)
as usual, they patch series is "light" on check-in comments --
in particular, there are none at all explaining why these
changes are necessary.

make code cleaner...
thanks,
-Len

ps. mbox applies better if "From" is not replaced by ">From"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux