On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:47:55PM -0800, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: > >I played with this a little, and got puzzled. > >My quad core box used exactly the same amount of power whether the > >'ladder' governer was loaded & in use or not. In both situations > >it was exactly the same as a vanilla 2.6.20 > > > >I'd have expected it to use more until I loaded up 'ladder' to bring it > >on par featurewise with 2.6.20. What did I miss? > > Quad core what platform? Glenwood > How many C-states are supported in this platform? Garg, only C1. That explains a lot. > Current ladder is mostly like Policy embedded in ACPI today. But, Adam > has > been working on different policies that we want to experiment with as we > go along. ok. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
