Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > This code makes simple systems complex: > > ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:03:04.0[A] -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 16 > ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:1d.0[A] -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 > ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:1d.1[B] -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 18 > ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:1d.7[D] -> GSI 23 (level, low) -> IRQ 19 > > The same code was already removed from x86_64 By itself I don't think we are going to observe any real problems with this patch. However if we are going to be serious about this we need to do a few more things. - kill iopaic_renumber_irq. - Increase NR_IRQS. We will still be limited to about 208 interrupts in use at one time, but we can allow more irq sources to be described. This reminds me. I really need to dig up my patch that doesn't allocate a vector for an irq until request irq time. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
