On Tue, 06 Feb 2007, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > IBM_HANDLE(bay, root, "\\_SB.PCI.IDE.SECN.MAST", /* 570 */ > "\\_SB.PCI0.IDE0.IDES.IDSM", /* 600e/x, 770e, 770x */ > - "\\_SB.PCI0.SATA.SCND.MSTR", /* T60, X60, Z60 */ > + "\\_SB.PCI0.SATA.SCND.MSTR", /* T60, X60, Z60, SATA mode? */ > + "\\_SB.PCI0.IDE0.PRIM.MSTR", /* T60p, IDE mode? */ > "\\_SB.PCI0.IDE0.SCND.MSTR", /* all others */ > ); /* A21e, R30, R31 */ Unfortunately, a bad design bug makes earlier entries in this list that happen to exist shadow any later entries, which is completely unaceptable behaviour for the bay support as earlier entries *will* exist in some models, no matter how you order the list. Len, if you have not pulled this one yet, please hold the pull request. I will not revert the patch, but rather work on a proper fix to ibm-acpi's bay_init(). -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
