Hi, On Thursday, 25 January 2007 03:52, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. > > On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 21:03 -0500, Len Brown wrote: > > > > Patch 03-05: > > > > add ACPI sleep attributes in sysfs. > > > > /proc/acpi/sleep is already deprecated by /sys/power/state. > > > > > > Does that mean we drop standby (S1) capability on PCs? > > > > I think we need to make /sys/power/state handle S1. > > > > There are two cases > > > > 1. Platform supports S1, but does not support S3. > > > > This is more common. You see this a lot on server-class machines. > > > > We could make "mem" simply mean S1 here b/c it is effectively > > the closest thing to S3. > > > > 2. Platform supports both S1 and S3. > > > > This is pretty rare -- at least on the systems I've got. > > I'd like the generic interface be able to describe and handle this case. > > > > I'm open to suggestions on what to call S1 if it isn't called "mem". > > 'standby'? That's what occurs to me from previous M$ usage. Yes, something like that, I think.. Greetings, Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
