On Thursday 21 December 2006 02:58, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Len Brown wrote: > > > > please pull from: > > Is this really all obvious bug-fixes? There seems to be a lot of > development there that simply isn't appropriate after an -rc1 any more. > > I want 2.6.20 to be stable, and one of the things I'm doing is to be > strict about the merge window. Yes, I recommend pulling this tree now. While there is a fair amount of text changed, the functional changes here are actually quite small, and have been in -mm for a long time -- some of them already shipping in distros before being upstream. Yes, there is a fair amount of fluffy cleanup here -- seems there is never a good time in the release cycle to do them, but as andrew says, we're in this for the long term, so we do have to do them some time. I don't see any big risks in them so it seems appropriate to push after rc1. Note that there is a much larger body of ACPI changes in flight that I have excluded from this pull request and are waiting for 2.6.21. thanks, -Len - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
