On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:43:19 -0500 Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Cleanup patches like this make it very difficult to work with -mm, > as they conflict with just about every possible change. hm, I'm a little surprised - I maintain the patch so it applies against your tree. I guess you have other stuff outstanding. > This means that if I don't apply patches in the same order > as Andrew's quilt series, then I've got merge hell. > And experience shows that there is a 0% chance that > I can apply patches in the order that -mm does. > > All this, for zero functional benefit. > > Andrew, please do not accept cleanup patches in -mm > that touch ACPI files. It would be easier if they were > sent to me and I got to choose when the "flag days" occur > based on what other patches are in the queue to Linus. It _was_ sent to you - I just sent it ;) In future I'll stage patches like this at the tail of the -mm acpi queue so the more substantive things don't get tangled up with it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
