On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > So it looks like we need this sequence: > > > > > > enable_nonboot_cpus() /* INIT */ > > > finish() /* _WAK */ > > > device_resume() > > > > Can somebody remind me about this immediately after 2.6.19? > > Remind. But note that freezer is not yet SMP safe... Rafael is working > on that. Thanks. On the other hand, I really wonder (and suspect) whether the problem isn't really the freezer or even the kernel resume ordering, but simply an ACPI internal resume ordering thing. Doesn't ACPI have per-device "WAK" calls anyway? Shouldn't we just call those _individually_ as we walk the device tree (perhaps in the "early_resume" stage) rather than calling them all in one chunk? Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
