On Thursday 16 November 2006 8:23 am, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> David Brownell wrote:
> > On Thursday 16 November 2006 7:41 am, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> >
> >> Looks like either EC GPE or whole ACPI irq got disabled... Could you
> >> check that ACPI interrupts still arrive after
> >> you notice AE_TIME?
> >>
> >
> > If I unplug AC, /proc/interrrupts reports 2 IRQs going to ACPI.
> > Then on replug, it reports 10-12 IRQs going to ACPI.
> >
> What is the state of kacpid and kacpid_notify ?
Not clear what you mean by this, but:
$ ps ax | grep acpi
51 ? S< 0:00 [kacpid]
52 ? S< 0:00 [kacpi_notify]
2971 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/acpid -c /etc/acpi/events.ignore
19240 pts/2 R+ 0:00 grep acpi
$
> >
> >
> >> Also, may be attached patch will help?
> >>
> >
> > I'l give it a try next time I can reboot (presumably by this PM).
> >
> > - Dave
> >
> >
> >
> >> Regards,
> >> Alex.
> >>
> >> David Brownell wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wednesday 15 November 2006 1:56 pm, David Brownell wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Wednesday 15 November 2006 6:48 am, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> ec1.patch
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Always enable GPE after return from notify handler.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> From: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> Yes, this seems to resolve the regression as well as Len's ec_intr=0 boot param.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Whoops, I spoke too soon. It does get rid of SOME of the AE_TIME errors. But
> >>> the system is still confused about whether or not the AC is connected, and
> >>> whether the battery is charging or not; and the CPU is still relatively hot.
> >>> Even with this patch I later got:
> >>>
> >>> ACPI Exception (evregion-0424): AE_TIME, Returned by Handler for [EmbeddedControl] [20060707]
> >>> ACPI Exception (dswexec-0458): AE_TIME, While resolving operands for [OpcodeName unavailable] [2006070
> >>> 7]
> >>> ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_TZ_.THRM._TMP] (Node ffff810002032d10), AE
> >>> _TIME
> >>>
> >>> In short, better but evidently not yet good enough...
> >>>
> >>> - Dave
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> IMO this should get merged into 2.6.19 ASAP ...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> drivers/acpi/ec.c | 2 --
> >>>>> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> >>>>> index e6d4b08..937eafc 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
> >>>>> @@ -465,8 +465,6 @@ static u32 acpi_ec_gpe_handler(void *dat
> >>>>>
> >>>>> if (value & ACPI_EC_FLAG_SCI) {
> >>>>> status = acpi_os_execute(OSL_EC_BURST_HANDLER, acpi_ec_gpe_query, ec);
> >>>>> - return status == AE_OK ?
> >>>>> - ACPI_INTERRUPT_HANDLED : ACPI_INTERRUPT_NOT_HANDLED;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>> acpi_enable_gpe(NULL, ec->gpe_bit, ACPI_ISR);
> >>>>> return status == AE_OK ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
