Re: [discuss] Linux 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 06:35:28PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
 
 > config X86_POWERNOW_K8
 >         tristate "AMD Opteron/Athlon64 PowerNow!"
 >         select CPU_FREQ_TABLE
 > 	depends (ACPI_PROCESSOR || ACPI_PROCESSOR=n)
 > 
 > But in the end, the best solution depends on how many percent of the 
 > X86_POWERNOW_K8 users have Christian's problem of requiring 
 > ACPI_PROCESSOR. If there are only very few people with this problem, I'd 
 > say leave it as it is.

Well, it's been this way for a while, and only recently this has come up.
There was a similar report for powernow-k7, which has a similar construct.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux