Re: [discuss] Linux 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 03:41:32AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
 > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.19-rc4 compared to 2.6.18
 > that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
 > 
 > If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
 > of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
 > of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way possibly
 > involved with one or more of these issues.
 > 
 > Due to the huge amount of recipients, please trim the Cc when answering.
 > 
 > Subject    : cpufreq not working on AMD K8
 > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/10/114
 > Submitter  : Christian <christiand59@xxxxxx>
 > Status     : unknown

As Mark mentioned in his followup, powernow-k8 didn't change in .19 at all.
I'm suspecting an ACPI change meant that we no longer find the PST tables
correctly.

Christian, can you post the full dmesg's from the working/broken kernels.
It may be useful to enable CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG too.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux