On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 03:41:32AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.19-rc4 compared to 2.6.18 > that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree. > > If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one > of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch > of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way possibly > involved with one or more of these issues. > > Due to the huge amount of recipients, please trim the Cc when answering. > > Subject : cpufreq not working on AMD K8 > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/10/114 > Submitter : Christian <christiand59@xxxxxx> > Status : unknown As Mark mentioned in his followup, powernow-k8 didn't change in .19 at all. I'm suspecting an ACPI change meant that we no longer find the PST tables correctly. Christian, can you post the full dmesg's from the working/broken kernels. It may be useful to enable CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG too. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
