Re: [patch 0/2] acpi: driverregistration again can report ENODEV

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We won't have such issues if we make ACPI use driver model.
I've sent out a patch series which throw the legacy ACPI driver model
away. The patches will be added to -mm tree.

On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 00:55 +0800, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > acpi_bus_register_driver must return -ENODEV when no device with
> > matching HID was found. E.g. battery also should currently get
> always
> > loaded even a system never has one.
> 
> If the driver wants to unload if it doesn't find any devices,
> it can easily do so by counting calls to its add() method, as
> asus_acpi.c currently does.  I don't think that's a good long-
> term solution, though.  I think it would be better to have a
> hotplug scheme that loads the driver when the hardware is
> found, like we do for PCI.
> 
that's true. With this patch series, .uevent method of ACPI bus will be
called when an ACPI device is found. Then udev script loads the right
driver by checking hid/cid offered by .uevent method. 

thanks,
Rui
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux