I would expect to see this same change in both speedstep-centrino.c and acpi-cpufreq.c, no?
On Friday 20 October 2006 17:30, akpm@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
>
> arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c:396: warning: 'sw_any_bug_dmi_table' defined but not used
>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c~acpi-cpufreq-remove-dead-code arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> --- a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c~acpi-cpufreq-remove-dead-code
> +++ a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -402,6 +402,7 @@ static int sw_any_bug_found(struct dmi_s
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> static struct dmi_system_id sw_any_bug_dmi_table[] = {
> {
> .callback = sw_any_bug_found,
> @@ -414,6 +415,7 @@ static struct dmi_system_id sw_any_bug_d
> },
> { }
> };
> +#endif
>
> static int
> acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init (
> _
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
