> On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 09:25 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> If we decide that "try HID first, then try CID" is the right thing, >> I think we should figure out how to make that work. Maybe that >> means extending the driver model somehow. > Don't think it's easy, especially no other bus needs it I guess. I agree it's probably not easy, but I think having the right semantics is more important than fitting cleanly into the driver model. But I know that without code, I'm just venting hot air, not contributing to a solution. How's the ACPI driver model integration going, anyway? I seem to recall some patches a while back, but I don't think they're in the tree yet. > Do we really need the memory hotplug device returns pnp0c01/pnp0c02? > What's the purpose? I don't know. But I think Keith already determined that a BIOS change is not likely. I hate to ask for BIOS changes like this because it feels like asking them to avoid broken things in Linux. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
