RE: [PATCH] Repost: asus strict model checking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> As long as this is not officially specified (by ACPI consortium and/or
vendors)
> and such special Devices exist, it is the best we can do.

Platform specific methods will never be in the APCI spec --
by the virtue that they are non-standard and platform specific by
definition.

The vendors should be using vendor-specific PNP ID's. eg, IBM0068
when they put vendor specific devices in the DSDT.

When that is not available, Linux is going very far out on a limb
when it mines the name space to match specific internal variables,
as there is no reason they could not match some totally different
machine.
Certainly the platform specific drivers that the vendors ship
on Windows does not do this.  I don't know what they do -- maybe DMI?

-Len
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux