Re: Generic battery interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 10:58:06AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 12:05:35AM -0400, Brown, Len wrote:
> 
> > Wonderful, but isn't the key here how simple it is for HAL
> > or X to understand and use the kernel API rather than the
> > developers of the kernel driver that implements the API?
> 
> HAL currently gets most of its information from sysfs, and managed to 
> deal with parsing the existing /proc/acpi/battery stuff. I don't think 
> there's any real difficulty there.
 
Yes, HAL does a lot of ugly work to be able to gather the information it needs.

-- 
Vojtech Pavlik
Director SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux