> acpi=off used to be handled by acpi_bus_register_driver()
> for these drivers.
> But now acpi_lock_ac_dir() and acpi_lock_battery_dir()
> for procfs are inserted before that in the _init functions.
This is fragment from SBS patch.
-----------------------------------------
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_ac_init");
- acpi_ac_dir = proc_mkdir(ACPI_AC_CLASS, acpi_root_dir);
+ acpi_ac_dir = acpi_lock_ac_dir();
if (!acpi_ac_dir)
return_VALUE(-ENODEV);
- acpi_ac_dir->owner = THIS_MODULE;
result = acpi_bus_register_driver(&acpi_ac_driver);
if (result < 0) {
- remove_proc_entry(ACPI_AC_CLASS, acpi_root_dir);
+ acpi_unlock_ac_dir(acpi_ac_dir);
return_VALUE(-ENODEV);
}
------------------------------------------
Order of proc_mkdir and acpi_bus_register_driver is the same as order of
acpi_lock_ac_dir. Could you explain what you meant?
>Vladimir,
>Any reason that the procfs stuff can't be after the
>acpi_bus_register_driver()
>calls?
If we move it after acpi_bus_register_driver(), calls to create files
inside battery/ac directories (called from acpi_bus_register_driver via
acpi_{battery,ac}_add()) will fail.
>Under what conditions could these lock functions fail?
If there is no /proc/acpi directory in which to create ac/battery
directories.
-----Original Message-----
From: Brown, Len
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 10:16 AM
To: Pavel Machek; kernel list; Andrew Morton; Lebedev, Vladimir P
Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [patch] fix boot with acpi=off
[adding linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx to cc]
acpi=off used to be handled by acpi_bus_register_driver()
for these drivers.
But now acpi_lock_ac_dir() and acpi_lock_battery_dir()
for procfs are inserted before that in the _init functions.
This will be a problem for sbs.c also.
Vladimir,
Any reason that the procfs stuff can't be after the
acpi_bus_register_driver()
calls? Under what conditions could these lock functions fail?
-Len
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Pavel Machek [mailto:pavel@xxxxxx]
>Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 8:44 AM
>To: kernel list; Andrew Morton; Brown, Len
>Subject: [patch] fix boot with acpi=off
>
>With acpi=off and acpi_ac/battery compiled into kernel, acpi breaks
>boot. This fixes it.
>
>Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx>
>
>---
>commit 30b8ecda788b096fbd7088808f9af65c41c3a83d
>tree 3c28088018932f9ceb18bcf980507474d4a50c4e
>parent 05f70501240c6ad5f852f13c187ee55579ad7bb8
>author <pavel@xxxxxxxxxx> Sat, 08 Jul 2006 14:43:13 +0200
>committer <pavel@xxxxxxxxxx> Sat, 08 Jul 2006 14:43:13 +0200
>
> drivers/acpi/ac.c | 2 ++
> drivers/acpi/battery.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ac.c b/drivers/acpi/ac.c
>index 24ccf81..432b6b7 100644
>--- a/drivers/acpi/ac.c
>+++ b/drivers/acpi/ac.c
>@@ -285,6 +285,8 @@ static int __init acpi_ac_init(void)
> {
> int result;
>
>+ if (acpi_disabled)
>+ return -ENODEV;
>
> acpi_ac_dir = acpi_lock_ac_dir();
> if (!acpi_ac_dir)
>diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
>index 2ce9b35..5af1f64 100644
>--- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
>+++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
>@@ -764,6 +764,9 @@ static int __init acpi_battery_init(void
> {
> int result;
>
>+ if (acpi_disabled)
>+ return -ENODEV;
>+
> acpi_battery_dir = acpi_lock_battery_dir();
> if (!acpi_battery_dir)
> return -ENODEV;
>
>--
>(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
>(cesky, pictures)
>http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
