RE: ACPI_DOCK bug: noone cares

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Sun, 9 Jul 2006, Brown, Len wrote:
> >
> >Fair enough. Reverted.
> 
> I disagree with this decision, and would like to know what
> is necessary to reverse it.

Mistakes happen. Fair enough. They happen all the time. This time around, 
for the 2.6.18-rc1 thing, I had heard more than the usual "nobody even 
reacted", as Andrew had held up two patch-series of his because of that 
issue..

So that makes me like it even less than usual when I'm told that a problem 
with something I merged was apparently known BEFORE IT WAS MERGED.

So Adrian's report on its own wouldn't have caused a revert. 

> If you address me directly when you are asking me to do something,
> that would really help me help you.

As far as I can tell, you were cc'd on all of these things, along with 
the linux-acpi mailing list.

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux