>> The key thing here is that our recent changes in >> how the locks are _used_ is okay -- and I think it is. > >Well. We don't know that. We just know that this report of unokayness >wasn't right. With Ingo's Linux-only patch we're in a >position to verify >that the locking is probably OK. If this were really recursive, my machine would have deadlocked instead of booting normally like it did, no? -Len - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
