>I have a situation where I need to get an ACPI device. The PNP system >seems like the way to go for this, but I need some extra objects from >the ACPI namespace for this device (_IFT and _SRV to be specific, >supposidly added in ACPI 3.0). There doesn't seem to be a clean way to >do this right now. What would be the best way to get these? If your code knows about specific AML methods, then it is by-definition, ACPI-aware, and can't be hidden (completely) behind PNP. Either that, or some ACPI-aware code needs to exist to intervene to allow your code to know know anything about ACPI. So you could make it ACPI aware like 8250_acpi.c was, before it was deleted... -Len - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
