> >- Modify do_IRQ to get passed an interrupt vector# from the > > interrupt vector instead of an irq number, and then lookup > > the irq number in vector_irq. This means we don't need > > a code stub per irq, and allows us to handle more irqs > > by simply increasing NR_IRQS. > > isn't the vector number already on the stack from > ENTRY(interrupt) > pushl $vector-256 Yes - and interrupts/vectors are currently always identical. If we go to per CPU IDTs I suspect the stubs will just need to be generated at runtime and start passing interrupts. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
