RE: [(repost) git Patch 1/1] avoid IRQ0 ioapic pin collision

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>But I guess using GSI/vector internally only would be fine.

The last time I tried to name a variable "gsi" instead of "irq",
Linus launched into a tirade that "GSI" doesn't mean anything to him,
or anybody else that googles it.  On the other hand "IRQ" means
something
to everybody, and if you google it you find all kinds of interesting
interrupt-related things.

My point was that "IRQ" means so many "interrupt related" things to
different people in different contexts, that it is effectively
meaningless.

But Linus was not swayed.

-Len
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux