On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 11:48 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 02:50:57PM +0800, Yu, Luming wrote: > > > - for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) > > + for (i = 15; i >= 0 ; i--) > > We certainly need to do /something/ here, but I'm not sure this is it. > Adam Belay has code to limit PCI state restoration to the PCI-specified > registers, with the idea being that individual drivers fix things up > properly. While this has the obvious drawback that almost every PCI > driver in the tree would then need fixing up, it's also probably the > right thing. it has a second drawback: it assumes all devices HAVE a driver, which isn't normally the case... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
