On 4/20/06, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote: > Having EV_ACPI might make sense for thermal/battery events, but not > for normal keys. No, I do not want EV_ACPI at all. If it does not map to standard key/button/switch abstraction it really does not belong in input layer. There could be a "battery" or "power" layers providing abstraction for ACPI/APM/whateverfor that kind of stuff, but not input layer. But KEY_SLEEP, KEY_POWER, etc are more than welcome. -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
