Dear Luming,the bug you are refering to, seems pretty much the same bug like I do have here. But I've got two questions. Could you please help me? And I do asume, that this patch isn't in the resent kernel yet, isn't it?
1) If I want to adopt your patch, I should use the values from my acpidump, but I can't find anything reasonable. What should my values look like? (see here: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=7762&action=view )
2) How do I ensure, that this native IDE driver is really used? Do I have to uncheck all non-native IDE drivers in the kernel config? (In my case it's the amd71xx, I guess)
Please excuse the silly questions, but I am pretty new to game of kernel configuration and compilation, but steady learning :-)
Thank you very much. Refering to: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>Bugzilla: >> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5604#c19ide_sleep.dpatch >> >>Patch: >> http://www.codon.org.uk/~mjg59/tmp/external-drivers-ide_sleep.dpatch >> >>------- Additional Comment #17 From Luming Yu 2005-11-18 07:49 ------- >> >>The ide patch mentioned in comment#16 is not complete yet. >>That is the reason for ACPI HANDLE IS NULL. >> >>So, It's not surprise it doesn't work.>>Could you try to remove error detecting code before invoking _GTM and _STM
>>And hardcode with :
>>
>>For invoking _GTM:
>>
>>{
>>acpi_handle tmp;
>>acpi_get_handle(NULL, \\_SB.C002.C0A6.C1D5, &tmp);
>>status = acpi_evaluate_object(tmp, "_GTM", NULL, &buffer);
>>...
>>}
>>
>>For invoking _STM:
>>
>>{
>>acpi_handle tmp;
>>acpi_get_handle(NULL, \\_SB.C002.C0A6.C1D5, &tmp);
>>status = acpi_evaluate_object(stat->handle, "_STM", &input, NULL);
>>..
>>}
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
