On Thu, 28 May 2020 11:32:50 +0800 Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Jorge, > > On 2020/5/27 20:42, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > Hi Jean-Philippe, > > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 12:10:38PM +0200, Jean-Philippe Brucker > > wrote: > >> I was wondering if you could take these two patches for v5.8. The > >> API change is a precursor for the SVA support in SMMUv3, and the > >> VT-d implementation of the SVA API (queued for 5.8) doesn't > >> implement iommu_sva_ops. > > > > I'd like some Acks on patch 2 (at least from the Intel people) > > before going ahead with this. > > > > Patch 2 in this series looks good to me. > > Acked-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > +Jacob, he participated in the discussions. > Patch 2 looks good to me, VT-d has a similar flow and challenge to stop DMA in mm_exit. We disable fault reporting during this window between mm_exit and FD close trigged unbind. Acked-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Best regards, > baolu [Jacob Pan]
