Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 00/21] PMEM NUMA node and hotness accounting/migration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Wed 02-01-19 12:21:10, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> So ideally I'd love this set to head in a direction that helps me tick off
> at least some of the above usecases and hopefully have some visibility on
> how to address the others moving forwards,

Is it sufficient to have such a memory marked as movable (aka only have
ZONE_MOVABLE)? That should rule out most of the kernel allocations and
it fits the "balance by migration" concept.
Michal Hocko

[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux