On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 05:14:05PM +0800, Kenneth Lee wrote: > Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:14:05 +0800 > From: Kenneth Lee <liguozhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Tim Sell <timothy.sell@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, > Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Zaibo Xu > <xuzaibo@xxxxxxxxxx>, zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxxxx, linuxarm@xxxxxxxxxx, > haojian.zhuang@xxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>, Hao Fang > <fanghao11@xxxxxxxxxx>, Gavin Schenk <g.schenk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, RDMA mailing > list <linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jason > Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>, Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>, Uwe > Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Kershner > <david.kershner@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kenneth Lee <nek.in.cn@xxxxxxxxx>, Johan > Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Cyrille Pitchen > <cyrille.pitchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sagar Dharia > <sdharia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, > guodong.xu@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Randy Dunlap > <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Zhou Wang > <wangzhou1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Philippe > Ombredanne <pombredanne@xxxxxxxx>, Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@xxxxxxxxx>, > "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > linux-accelerators@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [RFCv3 PATCH 1/6] uacce: Add documents for WarpDrive/uacce > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) > Message-ID: <20181119091405.GE157308@Turing-Arch-b> > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 04:54:55PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 16:54:55 +0200 > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> > > To: Kenneth Lee <liguozhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > CC: Kenneth Lee <nek.in.cn@xxxxxxxxx>, Tim Sell <timothy.sell@xxxxxxxxxx>, > > linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Alexander Shishkin > > <alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Zaibo Xu <xuzaibo@xxxxxxxxxx>, > > zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxxxx, linuxarm@xxxxxxxxxx, haojian.zhuang@xxxxxxxxxx, > > Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>, Hao Fang <fanghao11@xxxxxxxxxx>, Gavin > > Schenk <g.schenk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, RDMA mailing list > > <linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jason > > Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>, Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>, Uwe > > Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Kershner > > <david.kershner@xxxxxxxxxx>, Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Cyrille > > Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sagar Dharia > > <sdharia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, > > guodong.xu@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Randy Dunlap > > <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Vinod Koul > > <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Philippe Ombredanne > > <pombredanne@xxxxxxxx>, Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@xxxxxxxxx>, "David S. > > Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-accelerators@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [RFCv3 PATCH 1/6] uacce: Add documents for WarpDrive/uacce > > User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) > > Message-ID: <20181115145455.GN3759@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 04:51:09PM +0800, Kenneth Lee wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 06:00:17PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 18:00:17 +0200 > > > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > To: Kenneth Lee <nek.in.cn@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > CC: Tim Sell <timothy.sell@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, > > > > Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Zaibo Xu > > > > <xuzaibo@xxxxxxxxxx>, zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxxxx, linuxarm@xxxxxxxxxx, > > > > haojian.zhuang@xxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>, Hao Fang > > > > <fanghao11@xxxxxxxxxx>, Gavin Schenk <g.schenk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, RDMA mailing > > > > list <linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > > > > Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>, Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>, Uwe > > > > Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Kershner > > > > <david.kershner@xxxxxxxxxx>, Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Cyrille > > > > Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sagar Dharia > > > > <sdharia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, > > > > guodong.xu@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Randy Dunlap > > > > <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Vinod Koul > > > > <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Philippe Ombredanne > > > > <pombredanne@xxxxxxxx>, Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@xxxxxxxxx>, Kenneth Lee > > > > <liguozhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > > > > linux-accelerators@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Subject: Re: [RFCv3 PATCH 1/6] uacce: Add documents for WarpDrive/uacce > > > > User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) > > > > Message-ID: <20181114160017.GI3759@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 10:58:09AM +0800, Kenneth Lee wrote: > > > > > > > > > > 在 2018/11/13 上午8:23, Leon Romanovsky 写道: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 03:58:02PM +0800, Kenneth Lee wrote: > > > > > > > From: Kenneth Lee <liguozhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WarpDrive is a general accelerator framework for the user application to > > > > > > > access the hardware without going through the kernel in data path. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The kernel component to provide kernel facility to driver for expose the > > > > > > > user interface is called uacce. It a short name for > > > > > > > "Unified/User-space-access-intended Accelerator Framework". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This patch add document to explain how it works. > > > > > > + RDMA and netdev folks > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, to be late in the game, I don't see other patches, but from > > > > > > the description below it seems like you are reinventing RDMA verbs > > > > > > model. I have hard time to see the differences in the proposed > > > > > > framework to already implemented in drivers/infiniband/* for the kernel > > > > > > space and for the https://github.com/linux-rdma/rdma-core/ for the user > > > > > > space parts. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Leon, > > > > > > > > > > Yes, we tried to solve similar problem in RDMA. We also learned a lot from > > > > > the exist code of RDMA. But we we have to make a new one because we cannot > > > > > register accelerators such as AI operation, encryption or compression to the > > > > > RDMA framework:) > > > > > > > > Assuming that you did everything right and still failed to use RDMA > > > > framework, you was supposed to fix it and not to reinvent new exactly > > > > same one. It is how we develop kernel, by reusing existing code. > > > > > > Yes, but we don't force other system such as NIC or GPU into RDMA, do we? > > > > You don't introduce new NIC or GPU, but proposing another interface to > > directly access HW memory and bypass kernel for the data path. This is > > whole idea of RDMA and this is why it is already present in the kernel. > > > > Various hardware devices are supported in our stack allow a ton of crazy > > stuff, including GPUs interconnections and NIC functionalities. > > Yes. We don't want to invent new wheel. That is why we did it behind VFIO in RFC > v1 and v2. But finally we were persuaded by Mr. Jerome Glisse that VFIO was not > a good place to solve the problem. > > And currently, as you see, IB is bound with devices doing RDMA. The register > function, ib_register_device() hint that it is a netdev (get_netdev() callback), it know > about gid, pkey, and Memory Window. IB is not simply a address space management > framework. And verbs to IB are not transparent. If we start to add > compression/decompression, AI (RNN, CNN stuff) operations, and encryption/decryption > to the verbs set. It will become very complexity. Or maybe I misunderstand the > IB idea? But I don't see compression hardware is integrated in the mainline > Kernel. Could you directly point out which one I can used as a reference? > > > > > > > > > I assume you would not agree to register a zip accelerator to infiniband? :) > > > > "infiniband" name in the "drivers/infiniband/" is legacy one and the > > current code supports IB, RoCE, iWARP and OmniPath as a transport layers. > > For a lone time, we wanted to rename that folder to be "drivers/rdma", > > but didn't find enough brave men/women to do it, due to backport mess > > for such move. > > > > The addition of zip accelerator to RDMA is possible and depends on how > > you will model such new functionality - new driver, or maybe new ULP. > > > > > > > > Further, I don't think it is wise to break an exist system (RDMA) to fulfill a > > > totally new scenario. The better choice is to let them run in parallel for some > > > time and try to merge them accordingly. > > > > Awesome, so please run your code out-of-tree for now and once you are ready > > for submission let's try to merge it. > > Yes, yes. We know trust need time to gain. But the fact is that there is no > accelerator user driver can be added to mainline kernel. We should raise the > topic time to time. So to help the communication to fix the gap, right? > > We are also opened to cooperate with IB to do it within the IB framework. But > please let me know where to start. I feel it is quite wired to make a > ib_register_device for a zip or RSA accelerator. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another problem we tried to address is the way to pin the memory for dma > > > > > operation. The RDMA way to pin the memory cannot avoid the page lost due to > > > > > copy-on-write operation during the memory is used by the device. This may > > > > > not be important to RDMA library. But it is important to accelerator. > > > > > > > > Such support exists in drivers/infiniband/ from late 2014 and > > > > it is called ODP (on demand paging). > > > > > > I reviewed ODP and I think it is a solution bound to infiniband. It is part of > > > MR semantics and required a infiniband specific hook > > > (ucontext->invalidate_range()). And the hook requires the device to be able to > > > stop using the page for a while for the copying. It is ok for infiniband > > > (actually, only mlx5 uses it). I don't think most accelerators can support > > > this mode. But WarpDrive works fully on top of IOMMU interface, it has no this > > > limitation. > > > > 1. It has nothing to do with infiniband. > > But it must be a ib_dev first. > > > 2. MR and uncontext are verbs semantics and needed to ensure that host > > memory exposed to user is properly protected from security point of view. > > 3. "stop using the page for a while for the copying" - I'm not fully > > understand this claim, maybe this article will help you to better > > describe : https://lwn.net/Articles/753027/ > > This topic was being discussed in RFCv2. The key problem here is that: > > The device need to hold the memory for its own calculation, but the CPU/software > want to stop it for a while for synchronizing with disk or COW. > > If the hardware support SVM/SVA (Shared Virtual Memory/Address), it is easy, the > device share page table with CPU, the device will raise a page fault when the > CPU downgrade the PTE to read-only. > > If the hardware cannot share page table with the CPU, we then need to have > some way to change the device page table. This is what happen in ODP. It > invalidates the page table in device upon mmu_notifier call back. But this cannot > solve the COW problem: if the user process A share a page P with device, and A > forks a new process B, and it continue to write to the page. By COW, the > process B will keep the page P, while A will get a new page P'. But you have > no way to let the device know it should use P' rather than P. > > This may be OK for RDMA application. Because RDMA is a big thing and we can ask > the programmer to avoid the situation. But for a accelerator, I don't think we > can ask a programmer to care for this when use a zlib. > > In WarpDrive/uacce, we make this simple. If you support IOMMU and it support > SVM/SVA. Everything will be fine just like ODP implicit mode. And you don't need > to write any code for that. Because it has been done by IOMMU framework. If it > dose not, you have to use the kernel allocated memory which has the same IOVA as > the VA in user space. So we can still maintain a unify address space among the > devices and the applicatin. > > > 4. mlx5 supports ODP not because of being partially IB device, > > but because HW performance oriented implementation is not an easy task. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hope this can help the understanding. > > > > > > > > Yes, it helped me a lot. > > > > Now, I'm more than before convinced that this whole patchset shouldn't > > > > exist in the first place. > > > > > > Then maybe you can tell me how I can register my accelerator to the user space? > > > > Write kernel driver and write user space part of it. > > https://github.com/linux-rdma/rdma-core/ > > > > I have no doubts that your colleagues who wrote and maintain > > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns driver know best how to do it. > > They did it very successfully. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > To be clear, NAK. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hard NAK from RDMA side. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kenneth Lee <liguozhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > Documentation/warpdrive/warpdrive.rst | 260 +++++++ > > > > > > > Documentation/warpdrive/wd-arch.svg | 764 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > > Documentation/warpdrive/wd.svg | 526 ++++++++++++++ > > > > > > > Documentation/warpdrive/wd_q_addr_space.svg | 359 +++++++++ > > > > > > > 4 files changed, 1909 insertions(+) > > > > > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/warpdrive/warpdrive.rst > > > > > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/warpdrive/wd-arch.svg > > > > > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/warpdrive/wd.svg > > > > > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/warpdrive/wd_q_addr_space.svg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/warpdrive/warpdrive.rst b/Documentation/warpdrive/warpdrive.rst > > > > > > > new file mode 100644 > > > > > > > index 000000000000..ef84d3a2d462 > > > > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/warpdrive/warpdrive.rst > > > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,260 @@ > > > > > > > +Introduction of WarpDrive > > > > > > > +========================= > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +*WarpDrive* is a general accelerator framework for the user application to > > > > > > > +access the hardware without going through the kernel in data path. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +It can be used as the quick channel for accelerators, network adaptors or > > > > > > > +other hardware for application in user space. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +This may make some implementation simpler. E.g. you can reuse most of the > > > > > > > +*netdev* driver in kernel and just share some ring buffer to the user space > > > > > > > +driver for *DPDK* [4] or *ODP* [5]. Or you can combine the RSA accelerator with > > > > > > > +the *netdev* in the user space as a https reversed proxy, etc. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +*WarpDrive* takes the hardware accelerator as a heterogeneous processor which > > > > > > > +can share particular load from the CPU: > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +.. image:: wd.svg > > > > > > > + :alt: WarpDrive Concept > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +The virtual concept, queue, is used to manage the requests sent to the > > > > > > > +accelerator. The application send requests to the queue by writing to some > > > > > > > +particular address, while the hardware takes the requests directly from the > > > > > > > +address and send feedback accordingly. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +The format of the queue may differ from hardware to hardware. But the > > > > > > > +application need not to make any system call for the communication. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +*WarpDrive* tries to create a shared virtual address space for all involved > > > > > > > +accelerators. Within this space, the requests sent to queue can refer to any > > > > > > > +virtual address, which will be valid to the application and all involved > > > > > > > +accelerators. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +The name *WarpDrive* is simply a cool and general name meaning the framework > > > > > > > +makes the application faster. It includes general user library, kernel > > > > > > > +management module and drivers for the hardware. In kernel, the management > > > > > > > +module is called *uacce*, meaning "Unified/User-space-access-intended > > > > > > > +Accelerator Framework". > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +How does it work > > > > > > > +================ > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +*WarpDrive* uses *mmap* and *IOMMU* to play the trick. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +*Uacce* creates a chrdev for the device registered to it. A "queue" will be > > > > > > > +created when the chrdev is opened. The application access the queue by mmap > > > > > > > +different address region of the queue file. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +The following figure demonstrated the queue file address space: > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +.. image:: wd_q_addr_space.svg > > > > > > > + :alt: WarpDrive Queue Address Space > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +The first region of the space, device region, is used for the application to > > > > > > > +write request or read answer to or from the hardware. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +Normally, there can be three types of device regions mmio and memory regions. > > > > > > > +It is recommended to use common memory for request/answer descriptors and use > > > > > > > +the mmio space for device notification, such as doorbell. But of course, this > > > > > > > +is all up to the interface designer. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +There can be two types of device memory regions, kernel-only and user-shared. > > > > > > > +This will be explained in the "kernel APIs" section. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +The Static Share Virtual Memory region is necessary only when the device IOMMU > > > > > > > +does not support "Share Virtual Memory". This will be explained after the > > > > > > > +*IOMMU* idea. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +Architecture > > > > > > > +------------ > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +The full *WarpDrive* architecture is represented in the following class > > > > > > > +diagram: > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +.. image:: wd-arch.svg > > > > > > > + :alt: WarpDrive Architecture > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +The user API > > > > > > > +------------ > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +We adopt a polling style interface in the user space: :: > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > + int wd_request_queue(struct wd_queue *q); > > > > > > > + void wd_release_queue(struct wd_queue *q); > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > + int wd_send(struct wd_queue *q, void *req); > > > > > > > + int wd_recv(struct wd_queue *q, void **req); > > > > > > > + int wd_recv_sync(struct wd_queue *q, void **req); > > > > > > > + void wd_flush(struct wd_queue *q); > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +wd_recv_sync() is a wrapper to its non-sync version. It will trapped into > > > > > > > +kernel and waits until the queue become available. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +If the queue do not support SVA/SVM. The following helper function > > > > > > > +can be used to create Static Virtual Share Memory: :: > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > + void *wd_preserve_share_memory(struct wd_queue *q, size_t size); > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +The user API is not mandatory. It is simply a suggestion and hint what the > > > > > > > +kernel interface is supposed to support. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +The user driver > > > > > > > +--------------- > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +The queue file mmap space will need a user driver to wrap the communication > > > > > > > +protocol. *UACCE* provides some attributes in sysfs for the user driver to > > > > > > > +match the right accelerator accordingly. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +The *UACCE* device attribute is under the following directory: > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +/sys/class/uacce/<dev-name>/params > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +The following attributes is supported: > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +nr_queue_remained (ro) > > > > > > > + number of queue remained > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +api_version (ro) > > > > > > > + a string to identify the queue mmap space format and its version > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +device_attr (ro) > > > > > > > + attributes of the device, see UACCE_DEV_xxx flag defined in uacce.h > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +numa_node (ro) > > > > > > > + id of numa node > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +priority (rw) > > > > > > > + Priority or the device, bigger is higher > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +(This is not yet implemented in RFC version) > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +The kernel API > > > > > > > +-------------- > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +The *uacce* kernel API is defined in uacce.h. If the hardware support SVM/SVA, > > > > > > > +The driver need only the following API functions: :: > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > + int uacce_register(uacce); > > > > > > > + void uacce_unregister(uacce); > > > > > > > + void uacce_wake_up(q); > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +*uacce_wake_up* is used to notify the process who epoll() on the queue file. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +According to the IOMMU capability, *uacce* categories the devices as follow: > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +UACCE_DEV_NOIOMMU > > > > > > > + The device has no IOMMU. The user process cannot use VA on the hardware > > > > > > > + This mode is not recommended. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +UACCE_DEV_SVA (UACCE_DEV_PASID | UACCE_DEV_FAULT_FROM_DEV) > > > > > > > + The device has IOMMU which can share the same page table with user > > > > > > > + process > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +UACCE_DEV_SHARE_DOMAIN > > > > > > > + The device has IOMMU which has no multiple page table and device page > > > > > > > + fault support > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +If the device works in mode other than UACCE_DEV_NOIOMMU, *uacce* will set its > > > > > > > +IOMMU to IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED. So the driver must not use any kernel > > > > > > > +DMA API but the following ones from *uacce* instead: :: > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > + uacce_dma_map(q, va, size, prot); > > > > > > > + uacce_dma_unmap(q, va, size, prot); > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +*uacce_dma_map/unmap* is valid only for UACCE_DEV_SVA device. It creates a > > > > > > > +particular PASID and page table for the kernel in the IOMMU (Not yet > > > > > > > +implemented in the RFC) > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +For the UACCE_DEV_SHARE_DOMAIN device, uacce_dma_map/unmap is not valid. > > > > > > > +*Uacce* call back start_queue only when the DUS and DKO region is mmapped. The > > > > > > > +accelerator driver must use those dma buffer, via uacce_queue->qfrs[], on > > > > > > > +start_queue call back. The size of the queue file region is defined by > > > > > > > +uacce->ops->qf_pg_start[]. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +We have to do it this way because most of current IOMMU cannot support the > > > > > > > +kernel and user virtual address at the same time. So we have to let them both > > > > > > > +share the same user virtual address space. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +If the device have to support kernel and user at the same time, both kernel > > > > > > > +and the user should use these DMA API. This is not convenient. A better > > > > > > > +solution is to change the future DMA/IOMMU design to let them separate the > > > > > > > +address space between the user and kernel space. But it is not going to be in > > > > > > > +a short time. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +Multiple processes support > > > > > > > +========================== > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +In the latest mainline kernel (4.19) when this document is written, the IOMMU > > > > > > > +subsystem do not support multiple process page tables yet. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +Most IOMMU hardware implementation support multi-process with the concept > > > > > > > +of PASID. But they may use different name, e.g. it is call sub-stream-id in > > > > > > > +SMMU of ARM. With PASID or similar design, multi page table can be added to > > > > > > > +the IOMMU and referred by its PASID. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +*JPB* has a patchset to enable this[1]_. We have tested it with our hardware > > > > > > > +(which is known as *D06*). It works well. *WarpDrive* rely on them to support > > > > > > > +UACCE_DEV_SVA. If it is not enabled, *WarpDrive* can still work. But it > > > > > > > +support only one process, the device will be set to UACCE_DEV_SHARE_DOMAIN > > > > > > > +even it is set to UACCE_DEV_SVA initially. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +Static Share Virtual Memory is mainly used by UACCE_DEV_SHARE_DOMAIN device. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +Legacy Mode Support > > > > > > > +=================== > > > > > > > +For the hardware without IOMMU, WarpDrive can still work, the only problem is > > > > > > > +VA cannot be used in the device. The driver should adopt another strategy for > > > > > > > +the shared memory. It is only for testing, and not recommended. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +The Folk Scenario > > > > > > > +================= > > > > > > > +For a process with allocated queues and shared memory, what happen if it forks > > > > > > > +a child? > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +The fd of the queue will be duplicated on folk, so the child can send request > > > > > > > +to the same queue as its parent. But the requests which is sent from processes > > > > > > > +except for the one who open the queue will be blocked. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +It is recommended to add O_CLOEXEC to the queue file. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +The queue mmap space has a VM_DONTCOPY in its VMA. So the child will lost all > > > > > > > +those VMAs. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +This is why *WarpDrive* does not adopt the mode used in *VFIO* and *InfiniBand*. > > > > > > > +Both solutions can set any user pointer for hardware sharing. But they cannot > > > > > > > +support fork when the dma is in process. Or the "Copy-On-Write" procedure will > > > > > > > +make the parent process lost its physical pages. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +The Sample Code > > > > > > > +=============== > > > > > > > +There is a sample user land implementation with a simple driver for Hisilicon > > > > > > > +Hi1620 ZIP Accelerator. > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +To test, do the following in samples/warpdrive (for the case of PC host): :: > > > > > > > + ./autogen.sh > > > > > > > + ./conf.sh # or simply ./configure if you build on target system > > > > > > > + make > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +Then you can get test_hisi_zip in the test subdirectory. Copy it to the target > > > > > > > +system and make sure the hisi_zip driver is enabled (the major and minor of > > > > > > > +the uacce chrdev can be gotten from the dmesg or sysfs), and run: :: > > > > > > > + mknod /dev/ua1 c <major> <minior> > > > > > > > + test/test_hisi_zip -z < data > data.zip > > > > > > > + test/test_hisi_zip -g < data > data.gzip > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +References > > > > > > > +========== > > > > > > > +.. [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10394851/ > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > +.. vim: tw=78 > > > [...] > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > 2.17.1 > > > > > > > I don't know if Mr. Jerome Glisse in the list. I think I should cc him for my respectation to his help on last RFC. - Kenneth
