Re: Question on import symbols generated by BCC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



OK, thanks for your advice. Just one more question before forwarding
to Robert de Bath : I see that Lubomir Rintel (alias lkundrak)
archived DEV86 on GitHub before you made a clone. Is this archive a
"save willy", or should I contact also this guy in case he is a
maintainer ?

Thanks,

MFLD

2015-04-08 18:45 GMT+02:00 Jody Bruchon <jody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> There is no mailing list I'm aware of for bcc. You may want to contact Robert de Bath directly as he was the last major maintainer I am aware of that worked with the compiler internals directly. We use bcc but we don't directly maintain it.
>
> On April 8, 2015 12:41:29 PM EDT, MFLD <mfld.fr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>Hello,
>>
>>No reply to this one... should I submit that case to another mailing
>>list ?
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>MFLD
>>
>>On 27/03/2015 18:55, MFLD wrote :
>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> While compiling a boot code for my embedded device that will load
>>>> ELKS from the Flash, I get some trouble while linking several object
>>
>>>> files together, some of them are .S compiled with AS86, others are
>>.C
>>>> compiled with BCC. Let me explain with a unit test to insulate the
>>>> problem:
>>>>
>>>> Here is the first source file "test1.s":
>>>>
>>>> .extern _main
>>>> .define _entry
>>>> .text
>>>> _entry: br _main
>>>> end
>>>>
>>>> Here is the second souce file "test2.c":
>>>>
>>>> extern void entry ();
>>>> void main () { entry (); }
>>>>
>>>> These simple sources make 2 cross references with 2 exports and 2
>>>> imports in each object files.
>>>>
>>>> Here is the object file generated by "as86 -o test1.o test1.s"
>>>> (objdump86 test1.o):
>>>>
>>>> OBJECTFILE 'test1.o'
>>>> MODULE  'test1'
>>>> BYTEPOS 00000038
>>>> BINLEN  00000003
>>>> STRINGS 0025 +0013
>>>> VERSION 0.0
>>>> SEG0 00000003
>>>>
>>>> SYMS 2
>>>> SYM 0    00000000 ...IT _main
>>>> SYM 1    00000000 ..E.T _entry
>>>>
>>>> text    data    bss    dec    hex    filename
>>>> 3    0    0    3    3    test1.o
>>>>
>>>> BYTECODE
>>>> SEG 0
>>>> : e9 .
>>>> RELSZ 2
>>>> DW _main-PC
>>>>
>>>> In the symbol table, we can see both the public import & text, and
>>>> the public export & text. That looks correct.
>>>>
>>>> Now here is the object file generated by "bcc -ansi -c -o test2.o
>>>> test2.c" (objdump86 test2.o):
>>>>
>>>> OBJECTFILE 'test2.o'
>>>> MODULE  'test2'
>>>> BYTEPOS 00000038
>>>> BINLEN  0000000c
>>>> STRINGS 0025 +0013
>>>> VERSION 0.0
>>>> SEG0 0000000c
>>>>
>>>> SYMS 2
>>>> SYM 0    00000000 ..E.T _main
>>>> SYM 1    00000000 ...IU _entry
>>>>
>>>> text    data    bss    dec    hex    filename
>>>> 12    0    0    12    c    test2.o
>>>>
>>>> BYTECODE
>>>> SEG 0
>>>> : 55 89 e5 57 56 e8 U..WV.
>>>> RELSZ 2
>>>> DW _entry-PC
>>>> : 5e 5f 5d c3 ^_].
>>>> SEG 3
>>>>
>>>> This time, in the symbol table, the public & import symbol _entry
>>has
>>>> the 'U' flag, not the 'T' as expected.
>>>>
>>>> Should not it be flagged 'T' instead ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your support,
>>>>
>>>> MFLD
>>>>
>>>> PS : the "boot code" I am writting is a kind of "coreboot" for 8086,
>>
>>>> could I name it "boot86" :-) ?
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-8086"
>>in
>>the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> --
> Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-8086" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-8086" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Linux ia64]     [DCCP]     [Linux for ARM]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux